site icon

An Exploratory Analysis of a Reading-Based Introduction to Proof Courses Compared to Business-as-Usual Introduction to Proof

If any information below is incorrect, please login and use the links below to correct it

Temporary image of the file type

RUME 28

2026

Alexandria, Virginia

An Exploratory Analysis of a Reading-Based Introduction to Proof Courses Compared to Business-as-Usual Introduction to Proof

Page: 1468

This multi-year project created a series of engaging, accessible proofs paired with their original authors’ biographies. The proofs and biographies were designed for Introduction to Proof (ITP) courses as a means to broaden the mathematical stories students encounter and challenge narrow stereotypes of “who does mathematics.” Exploratory analyses from nine ITP sections examined the effects of pre-survey scores, gender, and curriculum exposure on post-survey scores for logic and sense of belonging. Data collection is ongoing, but preliminary results show that higher pre-survey scores predict greater post-survey gains in logic (3.57 points per SD) and sense of belonging (5.34 points per SD), with women predicted to score 1.87 points higher on logic.

Editors may log in and edit entries here with permissions.