site icon

Argument-Mirroring Proof-Texts: A Tool for Leveraging Students’ Incoherent Thinking to Effect Greater Coherence

If any information below is incorrect, please login and use the links below to correct it

Temporary image of the file type

RUME 27

2025

Alexandria, Virginia

Argument-Mirroring Proof-Texts: A Tool for Leveraging Students’ Incoherent Thinking to Effect Greater Coherence

Page: 1576

"This report details a teaching experiment (Steffe & Thompson, 2000) which consisted of clinical interviews (Clement, 2000) and exploratory teaching interviews (Sellers, 2020) designed to perturb selected students’ incoherent thinking. In short, this study addressed the following research questions: 1) In what ways are students’ understandings of the chain rule coherent with one another? 2) How do students respond to proof-texts which mirror their own incoherent thinking?"

Editors may log in and edit entries here with permissions.