site icon

Obligations and Norms: How Instructors Respond to Students’ Correct but Non-Traditional Proofs

If any information below is incorrect, please login and use the links below to correct it

Temporary image of the file type

RUME 26

2024

Omaha, Nebraska

Obligations and Norms: How Instructors Respond to Students’ Correct but Non-Traditional Proofs

Page: 642

Proof is a central pillar of mathematical practice, and so teaching proof to undergraduate students is a necessary responsibility for undergraduate mathematics instructors. Our study contributes to research on how instructors can achieve this goal by examining their responses to student-generated existence proofs. In particular, the simple logical structure of an existence proof allows for proof-writing norms to be the focus of attention. By analyzing instructors’ responses to students’ existence proofs in terms of norms, values, and professional obligations, our study attends to the ways in which norms are (or are not) supported by instructors in undergraduate mathematics classrooms.

Editors may log in and edit entries here with permissions.