site icon

To Reject or Not to Reject: One Student’s Non-Normative Decision Procedure for Testing a Null Hypothesis

If any information below is incorrect, please login and use the links below to correct it

Temporary image of the file type

PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH IN UNDERGRADUATE MATHEMATICS EDUCATION (Vol 2)

2012

Portland, Oregon

To Reject or Not to Reject: One Student’s Non-Normative Decision Procedure for Testing a Null Hypothesis

Page: 2-116

The purpose of this study was to gain insight into how engagement with hands-on and computer resampling methods affected a statistically naïve student’s emergent understandings of statistical inference. In this study, simulation design activities provided a vehicle for engaging a student with the core ideas of hypothesis testing. The results highlight challenges the student experienced in coordinating the components of the logic into a coherent scheme of ideas and sheds light on aspects of engagement which need to be emphasized in order to resolve the inherent conceptual difficulties associated with reasoning that invokes a modus tollens-like argument. Moreover, I report on a heuristic the student used to make his inferential decisions— one that does not produce correct inferences. I’ve termed this the “similarity heuristic” because of a specific similarity relationship the student would look for and then use as a method for rejecting or not rejecting the hypothesis being tested.

Editors may log in and edit entries here with permissions.