site icon

Mathematicians’ evaluations of the language of mathematical proof writing at the undergraduate level in three different pedagogical contexts

If any information below is incorrect, please login and use the links below to correct it

Temporary image of the file type

PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH IN UNDERGRADUATE MATHEMATICS EDUCATION

2017

San Diego, California

Mathematicians’ evaluations of the language of mathematical proof writing at the undergraduate level in three different pedagogical contexts

Page: 707

This proposal discusses the extent to which mathematicians agree amongst themselves with regard to what are some of the linguistic conventions of mathematical proof writing. Data from a survey of 128 mathematicians are used to address this question. Participants were asked whether various excerpts highlighted in four partial proofs were unconventional in each of three different contexts: how proofs appear in undergraduate mathematics textbooks, what instructors write on the blackboard in undergraduate mathematics courses, and how students write proofs in these courses. These data point to a lack of agreement among mathematicians on the linguistic expectations of the proofs written by their students.

Editors may log in and edit entries here with permissions.