site icon

Undergraduate students proof-reading strategies: A case study at one research institution

If any information below is incorrect, please login and use the links below to correct it

Temporary image of the file type

PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH IN UNDERGRADUATE MATHEMATICS EDUCATION

2016

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Undergraduate students proof-reading strategies: A case study at one research institution

Page: 684

Weber and Mejia-Ramos (2013) identified five effective proof-reading strategies that undergraduate students in proof-based courses can use to facilitate their proof comprehension. Following their study, we designed a survey study to examine how undergraduate students’ proof-reading strategies relate to what proficient learners of mathematics (mathematics professors) say undergraduates should employ when reading proofs. Our preliminary findings are: (i) Majority of the professors in our study claimed that undergraduates should use the strategies identified in Weber and Mejia-Ramos’ (2013) study, (ii) Professors’ response significantly differed from undergraduates’ in only two of the five proof-reading strategies described in Weber and Mejia-Ramos’ (2013) study (trying to prove a theorem before reading its proof and illustrating confusing assertions with examples), and finally (iii) Undergraduate students, for the most part, tend to agree with their professors’ preferred proof-reading strategies.

Editors may log in and edit entries here with permissions.