site icon

Mathematicians’ rationale for presenting proofs: A case study of introductory abstract algebra and real analysis courses

If any information below is incorrect, please login and use the links below to correct it

Temporary image of the file type

PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH IN UNDERGRADUATE MATHEMATICS EDUCATION

2016

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Mathematicians’ rationale for presenting proofs: A case study of introductory abstract algebra and real analysis courses

Page: 677

Proofs are essential to communicate mathematics in upper-level undergraduate courses. In an interview study with nine mathematicians, Weber (2012) describes five reasons for why mathematicians present proofs to their undergraduate students. Following Weber’s (2012) study, we designed a mixed study to specifically examine what mathematicians say undergraduates should gain from the proofs they read or see during lecture in introductory abstract algebra and real analysis. Our preliminary findings suggest that: (i) A significant number of mathematicians said undergraduates should gain the skills needed to recognize various proof type and proving techniques, (ii) consistent with Weber’s (2012) findings, only one mathematician said undergraduates should gain conviction from proofs, and finally (3) some mathematicians presented proof for reasons not described in Weber’s (2012) study such as to help their students develop appreciation for rigor.

Editors may log in and edit entries here with permissions.