site icon

When research on proof-oriented mathematical behavior should attend to the role of particular mathematical content

If any information below is incorrect, please login and use the links below to correct it

Temporary image of the file type

PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH IN UNDERGRADUATE MATHEMATICS EDUCATION

2016

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

When research on proof-oriented mathematical behavior should attend to the role of particular mathematical content

Page: 668

Because proving characterizes much mathematical practice, it continues to be a prominent focus of mathematics education research. Aspects of proving, such as definition use, example use, and logic, act as subdomains for this area of research. To yield such content-general claims, studies often downplay or try to control for the influence of particular mathematical content (analysis, algebra, number theory etc.) and students’ mathematical meanings for this content. In this paper, we consider the possible negative consequences for mathematics education research of adopting such a domain-general characterization of proving behavior. We do so by comparing content-general and content-specific analyses of two proving episodes taken from the prior research of the two authors respectively. We intend to sensitize the research community to the role particular mathematical content can and should play in research on mathematical proving.

Editors may log in and edit entries here with permissions.