site icon

Are Students Better at Validation after an Inquiry-Based Transition-To-Proof Course?

If any information below is incorrect, please login and use the links below to correct it

Temporary image of the file type

PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH IN UNDERGRADUATE MATHEMATICS EDUCATION

2014

Denver, Colorado

Are Students Better at Validation after an Inquiry-Based Transition-To-Proof Course?

Page: 232

We present the results of a study of the observed proof validation abilities and behaviors of sixteen undergraduates after taking an inquiry-based transition-to- proof course. Students were interviewed individually towards the end of the course using the same protocol that we had used earlier at the beginning of a similar course (Selden and Selden, 2003). Results include a description of the students’ observed validation behaviors, a description of their proffered evaluative comments, and the, perhaps counterintuitive, suggestion that taking an inquiry- based transition-to-proof course does not seem to enhance validation abilities. We also discuss distinctions between proof validation, proof comprehension, proof construction and proof evaluation and the need for research on their interrelations.

Editors may log in and edit entries here with permissions.