site icon

Does/Should theory building have a place in the mathematics curriculum?

If any information below is incorrect, please login and use the links below to correct it

Temporary image of the file type

PROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH IN UNDERGRADUATE MATHEMATICS EDUCATION (Vol 2)

2013

Denver, Colorado

Does/Should theory building have a place in the mathematics curriculum?

Page: 2-327

Mathematicians distinguish two modes of their practice – problem solving and theory building. While problem solving has a robust presence in the mathematics curriculum, it is less clear whether theory building does, or should, have such a place. I will report on a curricular design to support a kind of simulation of mathematical theory building. It is based on the notion of a “common structure problem set” (CSPS). This is a small set of mathematical problems with a two-part assignment: I. Solve the problems; and II. Find, articulate, and demonstrate a mathematical structure common to all of them. Some examples will be presented and analyzed. Relations of this construct to earlier ideas in the literature will be presented, in particular to the notion of isomorphic problems, and cognitive transfer. Designing effective instructional enactments of a CSPS is still very much in an experimental stage, and feedback about this would be welcome.

Editors may log in and edit entries here with permissions.