site icon

Student self-and simulated peer-evaluation of proof comprehension: Tina

If any information below is incorrect, please login and use the links below to correct it

Temporary image of the file type

PROCEEDINGS OF THE 23RD ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH IN UNDERGRADUATE MATHEMATICS EDUCATION

2020

Boston, Massachusetts

Student self-and simulated peer-evaluation of proof comprehension: Tina

Page: 303

Research shows that students in mathematics can benefit from participating in self- and peer-evaluation. However, many students lack the self-confidence in their ability to grade their peers’ work and often provide feedback that is unhelpful. This study investigates the criteria used by a student to evaluate responses to questions on an assignment pertaining to comprehension of a proof by contradiction. Two interviews were conducted with the student more than one year apart in which she evaluated her own responses and responses written by an instructor to the questions in the assignment. Through the lens of achievement goals, results provided show a shift in the way she used her criteria to provide evaluations of these responses. Further, analysis indicates students may benefit from regular activities and practice in self-/peer- evaluation of proofs without assigning a grade to help their reflection and sense-making abilities.

Editors may log in and edit entries here with permissions.