site icon

A Guided Reinvention of the Definitions of Ring, Integral Domain, and Field

If any information below is incorrect, please login and use the links below to correct it

Temporary image of the file type

PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH IN UNDERGRADUATE MATHEMATICS EDUCATION (Vol 2)

2012

Portland, Oregon

A Guided Reinvention of the Definitions of Ring, Integral Domain, and Field

Page: 2-380

The struggles of undergraduate students with their first course in abstract algebra are well-documented (Dubinsky, Dautermann, Leron, & Zazkis, 1994; Hazzan & Leron, 1996; Leron & Dubinsky, 1995). The course is often the first encounter with higher mathematics for many students; in particular, they are exposed to algebraic structures which form unifying threads throughout the rest of mathematics (Edwards & Brenton, 1999). Unfortunately, many students struggle with this transition to higher mathematics and fail to understand even the subject’s most basic and fundamental concepts (Dubinsky et al, 1994). As a result, many students who are initially interested in mathematics experience a complete reversal of opinion and become indifferent or disengaged. Leron and Dubinsky (1995) even go so far as to state that “[the] teaching of abstract algebra is a disaster, and this remains true almost independently of the quality of the lectures” (p. 227). To this end, alternative approaches to teaching abstract algebra must be explored.

Editors may log in and edit entries here with permissions.