site icon

Student Intuition Behind the Chain Rule and How Function Notation Interferes

If any information below is incorrect, please login and use the links below to correct it

Temporary image of the file type

PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH IN UNDERGRADUATE MATHEMATICS EDUCATION

2018

San Diego, California

Student Intuition Behind the Chain Rule and How Function Notation Interferes

Page: 1586

Recently, Speer and Kung (2016) informed the RUME community on what was missing from our research. In an effort to begin to fill these gaps in the literature, we explored students conceptual understanding of the chain rule in Calculus I classrooms taught by the first author. In this teaching experiment (Steffe & Thompson, 2000), our preliminary results indicate that if students are afforded opportunities to engage in experientially real tasks (Freudenthal, 1991; Rasmussen & King, 2000) on the chain rule, they understand the purpose it serves and can extend that understanding to varied contexts. However, the largest interference to this understanding was function notation, particularly nested function notation. Implications indicate that the instruction of chain rule could be enhanced by preempting a chain rule unit with nested function notation, while still maintaining tasks centered around a conceptual understanding of the chain rule.

Editors may log in and edit entries here with permissions.